[ I've been trying to let this stuff drop. *sigh* ] On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:49:01PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
<rant snipped>
>You've not been constructive either ("LaLaLa" indeed!) and I
>can't fix your organisation despite you. There's no need to
>wonder at my motives. I've written them several times:
>1. I want no connection with DUS right now; including
>2. I want DUS not to hold my personal details (especially not
>the inaccurate personal details it currently uses).
Mark, you keep on mentioning this. Precisely what personal details do
you think D-UK holds about you, either correct or incorrect?
>How I see this can go forwards:
>
>a. DUS is repaired minimally, to be opt-in not opt-out, but
>your constitution offers no amendment, so I don't see how;
>
>b. willing DUS members reform as something sounder and don't
>try to contaminate other developers with their legal toys; or
>
>c. I slowly work through "Not In Our Name"-style tactics.
d. You could grow up...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mature Sporty Personal
More Innovation More Adult
A Man in Dandism
Powered Midship Specialty
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
