On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:41:44AM +0300, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Adam McKenna wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 01:00:28AM +0100, Rich Walker wrote: > > > Why should Debian *advertise* the services of someone who will not > > > return the favour? > > > > Why should a consultant be *forced* to advertise for Debian in order > > to obtain listing in our directory? > > Why shouldn't we expect consultants to advertise the services that > lead their placement on Debian's consultant list? I mean, isn't the > whole point of having them on the list that they provide services for > Debian?
Which they might actually be doing. otoh, if we had the policy of listing anybody who links to us, what would we do when a company requests a listing, and the link back to www.debian.org is in the context of "Well, we all know Debian sucks, so we're going to help you migrating to Ubuntu for a fee - they at least promise five years of security support"? Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
