-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 25-12-2004 23:38, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 12:38:39AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >>On 24-12-2004 23:44, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >>[bla bla comment on an earlier post, and then...:] >> >>>Anyway, this discussion should be on -project. >> >>Please post your point at the proper list - noone will do it for you. >> >>Responding and then complaining solves nothing IMHO. >> >> >> - Jonas >> >>P.S. >> >>I took the liberty to quote your private text in public, even though you >>did not (explicitly) permitted it. >> >>Also, I cross-posted this mail for those too lazy to subscribe to >>- -project (it is a sad fact that -private is promoted by being the only >>list subscribed by default). Please follow up only on -project. >> >>What I wrote here is not private: I hereby permit my parts of this email >>to be quoted anywhere - preferrably in public. >> >>Please join the recent thread on -project to help define a simpler way >>to promote non-privacy than this! > > > What's the point in reposting this on -project if "this discussion" is > totally undefined for people on -project?
Any discussion taking place on -private but belonging to a public list is a violation of our social contract. The point of posting to -project is to invite possible further discussion about this (wether you, your mom or someone else is responsible for moving a thread that does not belong to -private) to take place on -project rather than -private. Does it make sense now? How would it make sense to have this very conversation on -private?!? - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBzjMin7DbMsAkQLgRAkW6AJsFOsctAmHj1G+8Kj8QQfFVgCSEJwCfQVYF QmF2HZ7BdhIi9evGR1Sc+kY= =y/Nc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
