-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 20-12-2004 13:58, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.20.1334 +0100]: > >>What I suggest instead is making it mandatory to include with each >>private post wether or not your own part of the email (what is not >>quoted from others, I mean) is private or not, and if it is, why. > > > Good idea. Maybe we could make this a properly formatted pseudo > header and bounce messages to debian-private that do not have it? > > E.g. > > Private: yes > Reason: because Jonas said so.
Very good idea! Could someone please help getting this moving? I seem to not get along well "speaking to the crowd"[1], so me pushing this would probably not be a good approach. In other words: Take this on, someone, and I'll support it 100% - Jonas [1] Such is my experience from school group projects and from discussions at -private and at Skolelinux: my main intend is frequently misunderstood and my approach seen as "snerring" (if that is the english word for "grrrr"). - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBxuipn7DbMsAkQLgRAm3qAJ9he5EYuHdiHgmLXO3dcfYjHIptBQCbB3jB deOZoWkPOB1qxs6dqoFv0XI= =p1vE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
