On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:07:51 -0500, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I don't see it as all that much effort, I guess, but I do see it as
> something that we really should have *anyway* (the mirror policy,
> that is). I also don't feel that Debian will be corrupted by having
> money available to it, or perhaps at least not corrupted any more
> than it must already be (erm, we have it now...).
It is how we get our money that is significant, I think. As to
the mirror policy, I suppose it is inevitable, though I am getting
rather tired of the need to put up defensive rules and policies to
cover ones butt.
manoj
--
[...] or some clown changed the chips on a board and not its name. (Don't
laugh! Look at the SMC etherpower for that.) -- from /usr/src/linux/MAINTAINERS
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
