On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:15:00PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:09:19PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > Fortunately, that is not the case with Canonical. > > Yes it is. Fork and forget is Canonical's modus operandi (despite all > the PR claiming otherwise).
Being in a position to know, much more so than yourself, I can say that you are mistaken. I can also point to thousands of lines of patches, representing work funded by Canonical, which are now present in Debian or filed in debbugs waiting to be merged. Handwaving and FUD are no substitute for facts. -- - mdz
