On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 06:30:20AM +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote: > To me the argument falls flat here before it even starts: the logotype > isn't software, and can't be treated as such, even less than > documentation can be treated as software (which also is quite an absurd > notion). > > What's up next, claiming that the names of authors and package > maintainers are software, and that they are freely changeable by > anyone? And license statements?
No, that argument can wait until someone actually tries to ship a package maintainer or author from the Debian mirror network. If you figure that out, please let me know before you go public with it -- I'd like to have the opportunity to dump any shares of stock I might hold in airline companies. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | Ignorantia judicis est calamitas [EMAIL PROTECTED] | innocentis. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
