> Are the ideas in these packages xenophobic? I never said that, I took an excessive example in order to make my ideas clearer.
> The anarchism package isn't > really. Whether or not you think that Debian is an example of anarchism > in action is irrelevant when you consider the fact that many other > people do (go search the list archives for the massive thread on the > subject). I've already searched for them before to post but I've just read many other to make sure of I am not mistaken: I am sure most Debian users and supporters aren't anarchists. You can read the Debian Social Contract which is my model in open source's philosophy. It doesn't defend at all the principles of anarchism. But the purpose of the topic is not to discuss the anarchist ideas or our interpretations of the Debian Social Contract. > in this case it's the King James Bible, which is a > very useful text for a large number of people (it is, after all, the > most widely read book in the world). You're right, although this book is not a reference for me and my spiritual life, it is one of the basis of our civilisation, and a model for many people. The problem is not here. The problem is that I don't understand why this religion is privileged to others, and especially why it is in a operating system. Please consult my answer to Richard Braakman for more informations about my point of view on this question. > they are debated about in > -devel during an ITP as to whether or not they are truly useful. If > they're both Free and useful, they are allowed in I precisely think that they aren't useful to an operating system... -- Nikos
