On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > It is also not right for us to disrupt our list services. Every time > this argument has come up, there has been a consensus that we need to > switch - but a refusal to do so without a viable list solution. Look > at the graphs; the mail volume is impressive, and we still have just a > few minutes turnaround time on all our lists. We don't want to let > that go; the project as a whole would suffer.
And this is all done on a single celeron 400, with 512m of ram. That, combined with the mail volume, and fast turn-around, is what is impressive.
