Oliver M . Bolzer wrote:
> So, how would the members of the debian-suoerh list order
> sh3, sh4, sh3eb, sh4eb according to importance and number of potential users?
> Then we can debate how many and which subarchitectures we compile and
> distribute.
And the sh port lacks proper maintenance at the moment, it seems. Out of
17 binary packages that I maintain, 7 seem to be outdated on superh, these
are small packages without gcc problems on ia64/hppa, which would be more
crucial. Hence, before considering more Debian architectures for SuperH
I'd ask for more manpower to push the current port. :)
Also, there is no /ports/superh/ on www.debian.org. That's also something
I'd ask for, proper documentation of the port... I'm willing to add things
if people send me plain text which can be put there. I don't know enough
about this port to write up something on my own, though.
Regards,
Joey
--
We all know Linux is great... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.
-- Linus Torvalds
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
