On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 04:06:04PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > But you're right -- there is an issue if the package shouldn't even exist > > in unstable (because it's been split up or renamed or some such). So we > > probably shouldn't propagate to unstable if the target is only stable. > I don't think we should propogate to unstable automatically at all. It > is the wrong thing to do, and will cause more problems if everything > isn't synced for all archs.
It could also do the wrong thing for new packages uploaded to frozen (like the postgresql-slink or gdb-arm packages for potato). Cheers, aj, who thinks making these rules without any escape clauses is a bad idea -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Thanks to all avid pokers out there'' -- linux.conf.au, 17-20 January 2001
pgpyDbug1zwMg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
