>>> No, it's all about free software. As far as I know, Qt still isn't >>> DFSG compliant. >> >>Ha, it occurs to me that the above naive assumptions are yet another >>example of the far reaching effects of the GNU/Debian FUD. I wish >>GNU/Debian would have the decency to clean up their mess. >
QT 2 is dfsg, but it is NOT gpl compliant is what I understand. > Well, Qt wasn't free several months ago, and, judging from how out-of-date > Debian is, I've always assumed they got stuck in some sort of weird warp in > the space-time continuum. If you mentally prefix all statements about > Debian with "six months ago", it makes a lot more sense. >
