> > > Here is my problem: I've always disliked section "base", as being an
> > > artificial set of packages otherwise belonging to standard sections
> > > (utils, admin, etc.).
> > 
> >  The current idea of `Section: base' is totally broken. I brought this topic
> > twice to the lists, but was unable to "build consensus"... =)
> 
> I think we have one now.

 Yes! And it was so easy for him!  =)

Reply via email to