On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.28.0819 +0200]: > > Does anyone oppose the 365 day maximum age for RFP bugs? > > I would say we should drop a line to -submitter in each case and ask > for (a) updates, and (b) whether they still want the RFP. Those who > say no or don't respond are sure candidates for removal (or +wontfix > plus a filter on the website).
I'd suggest sending a message to -done for RFPs that haven't seen any activity in > 1 year with specific instructions on how to reopen the bug if they are still interested in having the package packaged. That way the bugs can be closed with minimal effort, and the submitter can indicate that they still want the software packaged with minimal effort. Don Armstrong -- "I was thinking seven figures," he said, "but I would have taken a hundred grand. I'm not a greedy person." [All for a moldy bottle of tropicana.] -- Sammi Hadzovic [in Andy Newman's 2003/02/14 NYT article.] http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/14/nyregion/14EYEB.html http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
