after reading your feedback regarding my campaining effords I would be interested in what kind of things you heared about me. I would not really care about names, more about incidents or whatever.
an other thing that i would like to ask you about is a more in-detail analysis of debian as a social group. I have a church background and i came accross a church growth tool which tried to benchmark 8 characteristics of any given church (look at my mail to -project about this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2002/11/msg00213.html at debconf3 the following year i gave a talk about this, arguing also why this research could be applied to debian. the church-research group was done with a strong statistical background and they try to identify the bottleneck(s) of the group and work to remove the greates bottleneck to enable it to develop further. my platform basicly contained my own, personal assessment of what debian's bottlenecks are. this research group tries to identify bottlenecks in groups by doing a survey of 30 involved people, asking them about those 8 key characteristics. they do need to "calibrate" these surveys for each country and then compare the results of a given church with their availale reverence data. here is a whitepaper explaining this process better: http://www.schuldei.org/report.pdf do you think this could be applied to debian, as a more scientific way to help us to develop our social side? Would you even want to work on this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]