* Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050414 13:45]: > * Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-14 13:25]: > > > BTW, Noah Meyerhans at MIT offered two Alphas but so far he hasn't > > > been taken up on his offer. > > > > As far as I know we're not short on offers. Alexander Wirt also offered > > an Alpha.
> Yes, and these offers are the reason I haven't suggested spending > money on lully so far; but if people think fixing lully makes more > sense, I'm more than willing to spend money on it. Frankly speaking, I don't mind whether we take a new machine up, or fix lully. But I think it's not ok to have a machine marked as "down - root fs drive died, no response from local admin" for quite a long time (actually, the "no response" should not happen at all), _and_ having only one alpha buildd (and as escher is also down, no developers machine). Whichever way we take out from it, is IMHO a common decision by the porters, debian-admin, ... But I'm really worried that this issues remains open for so long. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
