On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:47:06AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:17:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Henning Makholm wrote:
>
> > There's probably also the "free-use" and "nonprofit-use" properties --
> > can I use this package without having to worry about the license, can I
> > use it at home, or at work as well? Maybe:
> >
> > free-use
> > free-dist
> > free-local-mod / free-dist-mod
> >
> > nonprofit-use
> > nonprofit-dist
> > nonprofit-local-mod / nonprofit-dist-mod
Charities and other "non-profit" situations, CD's "not for profit" and
so on.
non-commercial-use
non-commercial-dist
non-commercial-local-mod / non-commercial-dist-mod
Personal use where work use requires commercial licence, for example.
> >
> > fsf-free
Should this rather be GFDL-free ??
> > osi-free
> > free-software / free-software-and-firmware
national restrictions / age restrictions
e.g. violent games in Germany/Brazil, non-Islam religion in Saudi
Arabia??
>
> This proposal is the best thing I've seen in this whole debate in years.
>
>
> Michael
>
> --
> Michael Banck
> Debian Developer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
