On Sunday 27 March 2005 22:10, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > Yes there should be accessible documentation for what all the teams are > upto and electronic systems could automate a lot of that. But eventually > someone has to monitor the electronic systems and then we are right back > to square one. Only those with an inordinate amount of time will be able > monitor everything. Those without time will have to choose the particular > bits they are informed about and will be at sea and unhelpful on the bits > they don't know about.
Just to add a data point: I was able to explain most of the Vancouver controversy to a DD who doesn't follow -devel in 15 minutes telephone time. After my experience with summarizing the -vote discussion I don't think I could do something similar (electronic document) with the Vancouver thread without several days of work. Regards, David -- - hallo... wie gehts heute? - *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch* - gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;) -- Matthias Leeb, Uni f. angewandte Kunst, 2005-02-15
