On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 07:14:55AM +1100, Sam Couter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:03:49PM +0100, David Weinehall wrote: > > Indeed. But not everyone agrees with your opinion that invariant sections > > are trivialities. > > Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > well, that just makes them wrong. and if they're obsessive about it, > > zealots. > > So your opinion is the only valid opinion? Well then, I guess the > argument's over! You're obviously correct. > > Hey, why don't we stop wasting time by discussing anything at all? We > can nuke all the Debian mailing lists and stop using the IRC channels. > Any time we need to make a decision, we can just ask Craig. > > Even better, we can do away with DPL elections and the entire voting > process. Debian's going to operate much more smoothly and, more > importantly, correctly under this new regime.
right. even after 6 days you can't come up with any answer to over 70 lines of argument in that message, so you retreat to the position of a coward and a cretin - delete all but one flippant throw-away line and make a stupid ad-hominem attack based on that. congratulations! you've just proved you're every bit as lame as the zealots. craig PS: and, frankly, my opinion is worth a lot more than the opinions of lamers, zealots, and cretins. i, at least, back up my opinions with evidence and reasoning. -- craig sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (part time cyborg) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
