Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2024 22:57:45 -0600
with message-id <2855031.mvXUDI8C0e@riemann>
and subject line Re: ghostscript-doc: "Raw 'bit' devices" section missing in
Devices.htm
has caused the Debian Bug report #748880,
regarding ghostscript-doc: "Raw 'bit' devices" section missing in Devices.htm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
748880: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748880
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ghostscript-doc
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
when I wanted to learn more about the DEVICE=bit output driver, I was
surprised to learn there is a pointer in the ToC of Devices.html, but
the link is broken, that section is missing.
This applies to all versions I've checked and exists also in the
online documentation privided by upstream at
http://www.ghostscript.com/doc/current/Devices.htm#bitraw
Can you please complete that piece of information?
Christoph
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.10.39 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 21 May 2014 20:41:56 +0200 Christoph Biedl <debian.a...@manchmal.in-
ulm.de> wrote:
> Source: ghostscript-doc
> Severity: minor
> Tags: upstream
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> when I wanted to learn more about the DEVICE=bit output driver, I was
> surprised to learn there is a pointer in the ToC of Devices.html, but
> the link is broken, that section is missing.
>
> This applies to all versions I've checked and exists also in the
> online documentation privided by upstream at
> http://www.ghostscript.com/doc/current/Devices.htm#bitraw
>
> Can you please complete that piece of information?
I'm not qualified to write the upstream documentation. Suggest you open a bug
in the upstream bugzilla: https://bugs.ghostscript.com/
Regards,
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
