Following from my previous message, # cat simple1.pcl >/dev/usb/lp0 # cat simple2.pcl >/dev/usb/lp0
works. The second file simple2.pcl is printed correctly. So presumably this suggests that it is a cups problem? A quick look at the foomatic ppd file didn't show anything obviously wrong to the untutored eye. Furthermore, $ lpr -oraw simple1.pcl immediately after also shows the bug: fragments of PJL are printed, not the rendering of the postscript. Again that seems to suggest a cups bug? Now I suppose that if I can get systemd to let me capture the raw cups output and it differs from the concatenation of simple1.pcl and simple2.pcl then perhaps that will give some clues. ael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
