Le samedi, 18 janvier 2014, 20.42:16 Till Kamppeter a écrit : > >> For the name for the new binary packages I am also a little bit in > >> doubt, -minimal is also not good as there is the smaller level-1 > >> configuration of no drivers/filters at all. The new packages are > >> for a configuration with a minimum support for directly talking to > >> printers. > >> > >> As filters for PDF, PostScript, PWG Raster, and PCL are also > >> certain > >> printer drivers perhaps we should say something like > >> -basic-drivers? > > > > -core-drivers ? AFAIK they are not -basic, but rather a selection of > > the most important ones, hence -core. > > OK, let us take -core-drivers.
ACK. Reviewing the package before uploading made me aware of a new question: shouldn't cups-filters-core-drivers depend (or at the very least recommend) on ghostscript ? At least: a) pdftoippprinter tries to use either gstoraster filter (in cups- filters) or ghostscript through CUPS_GHOSTSCRIPT, then fallbacks to pdftoraster. b) pdftops tries to use gs through CUPS_GHOSTSCRIPT if pdftops-renderer is configured that way (which is default as far as I could see). So for b) at least, cups-filters-core-drivers needs to depend on ghostscript, which is apparently conflicting with the goal of having a small-footprint package. The other possibility is to configure cups- filters with --with-pdftops=hybrid, no? Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4504311.XRL7vO3rUZ@gyllingar
