reassign 582522 ghostscript 8.64~dfsg-2 quit Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Bill Allombert wrote:
>> Honestly, unless you provide evidence that PS files that include invalid >> jpeg-encoded data are still in use, I am not going to include two new >> packages >> to support non-standard compliant data in Debian, and in any case, I doubt >> the >> FTP master would let me. > > Makes sense. Currently ghostscript/README.Debian says: [...] > http://www.ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-code-review/2002-March/002275.html > tells a slightly different story: [...] > So I do not even think that there are old Adobe interpreters involved > (despite what jpeglib.h says). Would it be enough to say something > like this? [...] > If you come across a file triggering either of these > conditions, please let us know by reporting a bug against > the ghostscript package. Hence reassigning to ghostscript. I suggest updating the README.Debian to clarify this, and perhaps contacting upstream to encourage them to consider dropping the "#define D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU 64" hack, too. Thanks for your help. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111223233507.GA25158@elie.Belkin
