On Tue, 2025-08-26 at 11:14 -0600, Stan Johnson wrote:
> On 8/26/25 8:15 AM, Cedar Maxwell wrote:
> > ... Could you confirm how exactly your partitioning looks like? 
> > I've gotten the kernel and initrd copied over and recognized by 
> > BootX, but never gotten the system to actually boot into Linux.
> > 
> > I understand that the partitoning has to be done particularly for
> > OS 9,
> > and in turn, Linux to boot correctly.
> 
> That sounds right.
> 
> I have this disk partitioning (edited slightly for readability):
> 
> # mac-fdisk -l
> /dev/sda
>          #                type name         length   base      ( size
> )
> /dev/sda1 Apple_partition_map Apple            63 @ 1         (
> 31.5k)
> /dev/sda2      Apple_Driver43 Macintosh        56 @ 64        (
> 28.0k)
> /dev/sda3      Apple_Driver43 Macintosh        56 @ 120       (
> 28.0k)
> /dev/sda4    Apple_Driver_ATA Macintosh        56 @ 176       (
> 28.0k)
> /dev/sda5    Apple_Driver_ATA Macintosh        56 @ 232       (
> 28.0k)
> /dev/sda6      Apple_FWDriver Macintosh       512 @ 288      
> (256.0k)
> /dev/sda7  Apple_Driver_IOKit Macintosh       512 @ 800      
> (256.0k)
> /dev/sda8       Apple_Patches Patch Partition 512 @ 1312     
> (256.0k)
> /dev/sda9           Apple_HFS MacOSX     16775392 @ 1824      ( 
> 8.0G)
> /dev/sda10          Apple_HFS MacOS       4194304 @ 16777216  ( 
> 2.0G)
> /dev/sda11    Apple_UNIX_SVR2 Debian_7   16777216 @ 20971520  ( 
> 8.0G)
> /dev/sda12    Apple_UNIX_SVR2 Debian_sid 16777216 @ 37748736  ( 
> 8.0G)
> /dev/sda13    Apple_UNIX_SVR2 Gentoo     33554432 @ 54525952  (
> 16.0G)
> /dev/sda14    Apple_UNIX_SVR2 swap        1048576 @ 88080384 
> (512.0M)
> /dev/sda15    Apple_UNIX_SVR2 data      106242608 @ 89128960  (
> 50.7G)
> 
> Block size=512, Number of Blocks=195371568
> DeviceType=0x0, DeviceId=0x0
> Drivers-
> 1: @ 64 for 23, type=0x1
> 2: @ 120 for 36, type=0xffff
> 3: @ 176 for 21, type=0x701
> 4: @ 232 for 34, type=0xf8ff

My drive appears to already be essentially formatted the same, except
you have additional partitions for your various other OS's and I have
an additional partition for GRUB (to prevent the Debian installer from
complaining, but maybe I should try again without this). But since we
aren't using GRUB this shouldn't affect anything adversely.  You have a
few additional Macintosh related partitions, but I wasn't sure if or
how I should create these as the OS 9 drive setup only created what is
shown below.

I tried re-installing everything with the latest 08-29 image, but now
the installation of Debian renders the drive unbootable (into Mac OS
9). Maybe something has changed with Linux/Debian, or I'm missing a
step, but I don't see why it's ruining my OS 9 install since I made
sure the Debian disk partitioner shouldn't be touching any partitions
related to OS 9.  The partitions still appear just fine on my host OS.


I also tried without a partition for GRUB and just skipped that part in
the Debian installer.  Still: Mac OS 9 booted just fine before, then
after the Debian install I get the floppy with question mark.

> 
> 
> > Since I can't even get it to boot, my first thought is I
> > partitioned my
> > drive wrong.  I just copied what that guy did in that article,
> > which I
> > can't verify is correct.
> > 
> 
> 
> The article may be correct; I just didn't use Apple's tools to
> partition 
> the drive. I used NetBSD's pdisk in MacOS 9 (look for pdisk in the 
> "installation/misc" directory of a NetBSD ISO. Either the ppc or the 
> mac68k version will work (oddly, the mac68k version works better in
> some 
> cases).
> 
> If you're comfortable using mac-fdisk or parted in Linux, those will 
> also work. You'll need to initialize the disk first in Mac OS 9 or
> Mac 
> OS X to install the Apple drivers. If you only plan to run Mac OS 9
> and 
> Linux, you can use Drive Setup from Mac OS 9 to initialize the disk.
> If 
> you are also planning to run Mac OS X, then you should use Drive
> Setup 
> from Mac OS X (Jaguar, Panther or Tiger).
> 

How did you use NetBSD's pdisk IN Mac OS 9 to partition a drive?  Are
you saying you did this on a running system?  I couldn't get the NetBSD
installer to boot on real hardware nor in QEMU, and the documentation,
although comprehensive, appears to be dated.

In any case, my partitioning done with OS 9's Drive Setup appears to
already roughly match yours, so I didn't spend much more time with
this.

> 
> > How did you create a custom kernel based on your hardware?  Could
> > you
> > share yours?
> 
> 
> I cross-compiled a kernel on an i86_64 system (you should be able to
> use 
> whatever system you are using as your QEMU host). I can send the 
> commands I use to cross-compile kernels if that would help.
> 
> I don't mind sharing my .config file, though I don't want to spam the
> mailing list. And your hardware may be different, especially if you
> have 
> a 800x600 display; I have these ATI graphics options on two
> Wallstreets 
> (both 1024x768):
> 
> Wallstreet-1:
> # dmesg | grep fb0:
> [    0.336988] fb0: Open Firmware frame buffer device on
> /pci/ATY,264LT-G
> 
> Wallstreet-2:
> # dmesg | grep fb0:
> [    0.178132] atyfb: fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI
> 
> What "video=atyfb..." option are you passing to the kernel from
> BootX?

video=atyfb:vmode:14,cmode:32 , but I tried vmode:10, cmode:24, etc.,
every combination since all I got after that was a black screen. My
model is the 266MHz, which came with ATI Rage Pro, 14.1" display,
1024x768, etc.
https://everymac.com/systems/apple/powerbook_g3/specs/powerbook_g3_266.html

However, as mentioned above, now that I can't even get Debian installed
without it ruining my OS 9 install, I will have to wait until I figure
that out until I can test any suggestions related to the BootX prompt.

> 
> It might make sense to install an older Debian from the ISO that
> Adrian 
> mentioned. That way, you can use dmesg to examine your system's
> hardware 
> (graphics, scsi, serial, network, etc.) and pick those same options 
> while configuring a custom 6.x kernel. If you pick only the options
> that 
> you need, it doesn't take all that long to build a kernel natively on
> a 
> Wallstreet.

I tried a few really old ones from 2019 that should theoretically
predate the removal of QUIK (although they appeared to use yaboot), but
those still didn't boot on actual hardware, and in QEMU they complained
that no kernel was available to be installed.  I tried an installer
from 2023 with kernel 6.1 and that worked fine, but it still ruined my
OS 9 install.  Again, the partitions still appears just fine on my host
system, but it won't boot in QEMU or on the Wallstreet.  I don't
remember what I did differently last time (maybe a year ago) to prevent
this from happening.  This is the first issue I need someone to advise
me on...

> 
> 
> > 
> > I don't have a faster G3 with SCSI, I had been taking the drive out
> > and
> > plugging it into my modern PC and doing the installation with
> > QEMU.  I
> > do have 512MB of RAM though in my WallStreet :-  
> > ...
> 
> That's interesting. I currently use QEMU only for m68k Macs but not
> for 
> powerpc.

>From what I can garner from the mailing list history, this whole
exercise wasn't necessary until about 5 years ago when the QUIK
bootloader was removed from Debian, making booting directly on OldWorld
impossible.

There appears to be a more modern replacement developed:
https://github.com/andreiw/iQUIK

Is there a way to manually install QUIK (or iQUIK) instead of BootX to
eliminate the need for Mac OS, so that I can simplify the entire
approach?

Although the latest release is 2016, the author (CC'd) made commits as
recently as last year. Perhaps he can provide some insight.

P.S. Stan: Any experience rebuilding batteries on Wallstreets?  I can't
find replacement cells (17670) or even smaller ones (17650), and from
what I read 18650s won't fit.

Reply via email to