Hello, On Mon 02 Dec 2024 at 07:38am +01, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi ppc64el porters, Sean, > > @porters, can you please have a look at the ppc64el autopkgtest regressions > caused by sbcl [1]? > > On 12/2/24 03:36, Sean Whitton wrote: >> I don't think I can do anything about this bug. Upstream aren't able to >> reproduce it. I don't think it makes sense to block sbcl's migration on >> this. I think that either we should ignore the cl-ironclad test failure >> on ppc64el or remove sbcl on that architecture, if you think that would >> be warranted. > > cl-ironclad *and* cl-postmodern. And the error is identical: > no size function for object at 0x100009bf80 (widetag 0x33) Right -- I think the error occurs when sbcl tries to load cl-ironclad, and cl-postmodern depends on cl-ironclad, so it's essentialy the same error. (Though, typing this, I realise that I may have assumed this without adequate evidence.) >> Please let me know if you would be okay with overriding the test >> failure. > > I assuming you didn't contact the ppc64el porters yet (apologies if you > did). Shall we give them a chance to investigate? I didn't. Many thanks for doing so -- I'm happy to wait. -- Sean Whitton
