On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 06:53:56PM +0000, Noah Wolfe wrote: > @Michael, if I may ask (and if I have this right), if the fix was > simply a name change for a newer version, and effectively useless for > us, what was the point of changing it, and what can be done to fix our > issue?
The baseline fix was applied to x265 in the experimental distribution, not in unstable. One could argue that you could just install x265 from experimental but that won't work either, because you would need to rebuild all packages that depend on the x265 library in unstable to be able to use the experimental x265. So this fix is practically useless to anyone running unstable but the maintainer gets to close the bug report as fixed. Cheers Michael.
