On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 11:34:12AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > This is something that needs to be discussed. A single user alone shouldn't > warrant such major change in a port. You always have to keep in mind that > changing the default compiler options also has potential impact on the > performance on more modern ppc64 systems like Apple Macintosh. > > So, while I'm generally not against such a change, I would like to hear > some voices first.
Without this change, you have to declare officially that e6500 and e5500 are simply not supported CPUs. -- Len Sorensen
