A shame seeing that there is a laptop being developed that is powerpc.
http://www.powerpc-notebook.org/en/

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:31 AM, luigi burdo <intermedi...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> yes no support for all PPC BE , PPC64 too.
>
> Only PPCLE (power8 and power9) are supported.
>
>
> Luigi
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *Da:* Joe Nosay <superbisq...@gmail.com>
> *Inviato:* venerdì 4 novembre 2016 16.25
> *A:* luigi burdo
> *Cc:* Herminio Hernandez Jr.; PowerPC List Debian
> *Oggetto:* Re: Release Architectures for Debian 9 'Stretch'
>
> Does this mean no support for e6500?
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 6:13 AM, luigi burdo <intermedi...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Im thinking to start a petition about ... "dont kill debian penguins on
>> powerpc"
>>
>> Luigi
>> ------------------------------
>> *Da:* Herminio Hernandez Jr. <herminio.hernande...@gmail.com>
>> *Inviato:* venerdì 4 novembre 2016 11.05
>> *A:* Christoph Biedl
>> *Cc:* PowerPC List Debian
>> *Oggetto:* Re: Release Architectures for Debian 9 'Stretch'
>>
>> To say that no one stepped forward is not true. Adrian stepped up and
>> asked to be the porter for PowerPC. There was an entire thread on PowerPC
>> qualifying for Stretch where he stated his desire to support it. In the end
>> his request was turned down.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On Nov 4, 2016, at 2:08 AM, Christoph Biedl <
>> debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de> wrote:
>> >
>> > Lennart Sorensen wrote...
>> >
>> >>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:09:56AM -0700, Herminio Hernandez Jr.
>> wrote:
>> >>> Is there even a chance for PowerPC to return as a release
>> architecture for Debian 10 or is that just wishful thinking.
>> >>
>> >> Well as pointed out in the meeting, it does not seem any architecture
>> >> has ever done so.
>> >
>> > I bet never before an architecture got kicked out that is ranking as
>> > number 4 according to popcon. The question is, are there enough people
>> > that are willing to support powerpc in Debian? The way downhill began
>> > when nobody stepped forward in the role call.
>> >
>> >    Christoph
>> >
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to