Ben, On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:16 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 10/03/2016 09:14 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> You need to consider that d-i only ships radeonfb (there is another >> bug report from milan@d.o requesting it) about that. So the question >> is really during d-i should we leave it as-is with a very low level >> offb, or try to tidy up radeonfb (radeon.ko will never be part of d-i, >> there is also a long thread about this). > > Can you point me to the discussion regarding radeon in d-i? I would be > curios to know what the problem is.
>From the top of my head I remember a mail (from you) where you gave some details as to why radeon.ko is not present in during d-i (only radeonfb.ko is). However today I can only find: https://bugs.debian.org/782058#51 I thought you mentioned some kind of regression, hence the reason to not ship radeon.ko during debian installation. Do you remember saying that, or am I dreaming ? Thanks much !
