On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 08:27:44AM +0100, Jo Shields wrote: > It's not the silicon - it failed on a G5 XServe as well > > It's not gcc - I did a successful build on gcc5. > > It's not the kernel version - it succeeded on a Mac Mini with > 3.16.0-4-powerpc... actually... You've been using a ppc64 kernel on that > POWER7, right?
Yes I have. > porpora (build daemon 2), powerpc-unicamp-01 (build daemon 1) and partch > (porterbox) all use 3.16.0-4-powerpc64. i've been having successful > builds on a G4 Mac Mini with 3.16.0-4-powerpc > > I don't have a definite 3.16 64-bit kernel success, or any 32-bit kernel > failures, in my data set. So it has failed on power8 machines, and on a 970 (the G5). What CPU was in the mac mini? Hmm. CPU |kernel|flavour|libc |monolite version|status|name ------+------+-------+--------+----------------+------+------- power8|3.16 |ppc64 |2.19-19 |4.0.4.0 |failed|powerpc-unicamp-01 power7|3.2 |ppc64 |2.19-19 |4.1.0.0 |works |rceng03 power7|3.16 |ppc64 |? |4.0.4.0 |failed|partch mac G5|3.16 |? |? |? |failed|porpora mini |3.16 |ppc |? |? |works | Could it be the monolite version in use? My working build says: Bootstrap compiler: Mono C# compiler version 4.1.0.0 The failed log on powerpc-unicamp-01 and partch both say: Bootstrap compiler: Mono C# compiler version 4.0.4.0 -- Len Sorensen
