Hi, On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 14:37 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: reassign -1 newlib > > Am 12.09.2013 08:31, schrieb Niels Thykier: > > Package: gcc-defaults,newlib > > Severity: important > > > > Dear maintainers of gcc-defaults and newlib, > > > > I noticed that gcc-defaults have removed the "gnu-spu" package in sid, > > but newlib still build-depends on it. Since there was no bug against > > either package, I am assuming no one has noticed this so far. As it > > is, this is one (of several) things blocking gcc-defaults migration to > > testing. > > > > This bug can be fixed either by re-introducing gcc-spu (possibly as a > > transitional package, if gcc-spu is no longer needed) or by newlib no > > longer Build-Depending on gcc-spu (since it is the last package using > > it). I will leave it to you to decide how this will be solved; please > > reassign this bug to the proper package. > > I don't maintain the spu cross toolchain anymore, as previously written to the > gcc and powerpc ML. So newlib maybe shouldn't build the spu packages anymore.
I guess this means users will also need to build newlib (in addition to the gnu-spu) if they want to do spu programming for cell. Matthias, please let us know in general what a user needs to do for this. -Geoff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1379002007.17454.11.camel@smoke
