Dear Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo and Philipp Kern,
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 10:46 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Sadly pbuilder doesn't print its version. It obviously doesn't do the right
> thing when creating its dummy package.
Yes, that's what I understood from the logs. The three packages were
here at first but disappeared in pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy.
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 23:45 -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> The problem is really pbuilder's version. If you checked the
> changelog, you would notice that version 0.199+nmu2 fixed bug
> #363193,
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 10:46 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Sadly pbuilder doesn't print its version. It obviously doesn't do
> the right thing when creating its dummy package. According to [0]
> it's fixed in testing, unstable but not in stable.
I was thousand miles away from thinking that the problem was the version
of pbuilder. Because I run *stable* I was naive not to check pbuilder's
changelog... I would never had that idea alone. So I thank you both very
much. It's interesting by the way that this bug isn't fixed on stable. I
didn't get why 0.199+nmu2 wasn't released for stable... No one pbuild
packages from stable I guess?
So I'm going to update pbuilder's version with the help of APT Pinning.
Again, thank you very much; best regards.
e-
--
~ #ID: e20100633 <e20100633()inbox!lv> #TTY: 9-8M 4554
~ TYPE 1707-A3 S/N L3-M2812 SLACKWARE 13.0 RLU #527034
,------- They say that Nethack bugs are Seldon planned
`-----------------------{,_,"> http://porneia.free.fr/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337286478.25043.27.camel@eva04
