-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi,
Le 20/05/2011 17:28, Holger Wansing a écrit : > David Prévot <dav...@altern.org> wrote: >> Le 20/05/2011 16:33, Holger Wansing a écrit : >>> [CC'ing debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, please keep me in CC, >>> as I'm not subscribed to that list] >> >>>> http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/ >> >>>> In this list the squeeze release is not listed. >> >>> Do you want me to commit such patch? >>> >>> --- ports_powerpc_index-orig.wml 2011-05-20 22:25:28.000000000 +0200 >>> +++ ports_powerpc_index-workingcopy.wml 2011-05-20 22:27:01.000000000 >>> +0200 >>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ >>> <p> >>> Debian PowerPC port was first officially released with Debian GNU/Linux >>> 2.2 >>> (`potato'). Support for PowerPC is continued in the releases 3.1 >>> (`sarge'), >>> - 4.0 (`etch') and 5.0 (`lenny'). >>> + 4.0 (`etch'), 5.0 (`lenny') and 6.0 (`squeeze'). >>> Please see the <a href="$(HOME)/releases/stable/powerpc/release-notes/"> >>> release notes</a> and <a href="$(HOME)/releases/stable/powerpc/">\ >>> installation manual</a> for more information. >> >> Why not instead use something that won't need further update on next >> releases, as: >> >> Debian PowerPC port was first officially released with Debian >> GNU/Linux 2.2 (`potato'). >> Support for PowerPC is continued since and is currently >> available with Debian GNU/Linux <6.0 (`squeeze')>. >> >> where <6.0 (`squeeze')> would be automatically updated? > > That's what I wrote in my initial mail, too, Indeed, so we already agree on this point ;-). > but the proposal above > does not include the same information as the old text. In the old > text 3.0 is missing. So powerpc wasn't a release architecture for > 3.0 ? It was, according to the following links, so the new wording proposal fixes this long standing issue too. http://www.debian.org/releases/woody/ http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/Debian-3.0/ > And: if you change to above proposal, and powerpc is dropped for 7.0, > you have to change the text again (ok, it's probably most unlikely that > powerpc gets dropped). Well, we'll have to update the page and state that the support was dropped in version X.0 (and I believe it would need to be stated explicitly enough, so a rewording would be needed anyway). Until X.0 is out, we could rest (which is not the case now). Regards David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJN1uD0AAoJELgqIXr9/gnyDi0P/1vkf88WjxMGLeoCStNppafe 4/W4sylAXc8b66KgIETfviL1uESP5ZZY5x9K+jA6MHKSrHtoaFIJxL8/6gV0DAVh /XrxihTSXzUh23T+jy4WGHitr3Wu5+ZLjzTr6nT3n6UbdzW3JrWFO+aZ1v9ZNHkh ap2ak1SZTf8ryXdWQGsKIpjDHybcPcv5cLnvzoEFUIhcnsrmzDrA2DTHge6Z55v5 2ulcAy0wXN9BWnqLnk202urjnootxwqZvcbnj5cdCKeH1rP2GdCci3PKh+69UmRl t+PPWBbkQkLPT9jsF2TyCjwLk+nHnZ1Qzlfk7Hp/ft7uaz4XGPic3jf5Im0YGkTt lHfoxKg4KcbNDcKcW6bj4LBWt3Zm4JR3itHXC5VKSVgdxkhAIHSgFG6X38DAbWyr mImNiQe/wW5MWLdag7gBQgoqLX7chc/AmC287/ztSG7vIf1W6WbQVaf3T4+KyDGS AyC+DaXdqKPYLYSt27XEVlF2b5gEaNFlATp0PMSexiJV2A++agNfnc1nLKPOPq/9 VdFdVk575Ni4YriixOt3rmsWICxVQ8yNo6K5iwE3CI4mawiW8UmI2cUXYfw9X0PE o9ZlQBRjuO/LiVfxczGIvC8sTsd1njgb8RdrHFYYyQa4X/98ynIGjwfEBu9O/8LE 7GE9vS5DlEFevjXDj80Y =oAjA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dd6e0f7.5040...@tilapin.org
