I believe perhaps the greatest factor is are new products being made and
expected in the near future.
one I know about is the new NASA/GM Robonaut2 just arrived at the ISS uses
34 powerpc cpus.
things in recent history included
75% of vehicles on the road using ppc processors,
many NASA deep space projects including the Mars rovers.
both of these have recently moved to the next generation / higher speeds of
processors (the heavy duty ones that are to consumers of course old / slow
but in the context of their use these are new generation).
although some or most of these industrial applications appear to be running
VME or some such non Linux OS, I believe that there is certainly future
potential for Linux especially in the aftermarket or smaller manufacturers
with tighter margins (perhaps the new commercial space ventures who knows).
another thing to possible speak of is the wonderfully improved support for
auto-vectorizing of altivec in recent versions of gcc. It would be a
terrible thing to waste this. But the port needs to somehow back it. Debian
being something of a behemoth, it is a wild hope that there would be good
support to simply user custom build systems such as altivec optimizing.
-------------
Another major major factor is is there (documented) plenty new blood of
developers and users in Debian for the port.
I was witness to the decline and fall of m68k and I believe this was a large
part of the problem (there was a new processor but its use was troubled by
lacking TLS (Thread Layer Security) support which finally was only provided
by a commercial interest and very much too slowly there to save them,
whereas if it were healthy I think it should have gone the other direction,
that is for Linux to support the development of the new hardware. Obviously
in Debian becoming dependent on commercial interests in software development
is a killer.
Brian
p.s. I am shopping for a development board for my research in autonomous
systems, and wouldn't it be nice to have powerpc ? but affordability is an
issue and also community software support -- it is leaning strongly toward
ARM.
any suggestions here ? The price / performance ratio is important.
2011/4/13 Rogério Brito <rbr...@ime.usp.br>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA384
>
> Dear people,
>
> I know that this is probably not as serious for PowerPC as it was for some
> other
> platforms, but it was, in my opinion, very sad to know that Debian has
> dropped
> support for 2 architectures: alpha and hppa.
>
> For some personal reasons, I felt particularly sad about alpha (I planned
> to buy
> one used machine for my own use), but, now, I sincerely hope that people
> more
> knowledgeable about the architecture reintroduce them as official ports of
> Debian again.
>
> As I would really hate to see these things happen to PowerPC, would other
> people
> join me in collecting data for a future requalification of PowerPC as a
> release
> architecture in Debian? Previous qualification/certification data are
> available in:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/powerpcEtchReleaseRecertification
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/powerpcLennyReleaseRecertification
>
> I know that this may sound a bit premature at this stage, but it is better
> if
> we, as a whole, report the errors as early as possible (and, for those that
> can,
> provide a few patches), so that ppc is as healthy as feasible and not in
> any
> danger of being dropped out.
>
> For those that didn't know about alpha and hppa being dropped from Debian,
> please read this:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/04/msg00000.html
>
>
> Regards,
>
> - --
> Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFCAAAA
> http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de
> DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQIcBAEBCQAGBQJNpdj+AAoJEAdHvTm8/Kqq1zEP/39AdTwzmwgzoYy58hov/Jro
> WRZfRJdjRfbmNUi173LFisYjYwidzng7uI+H8a57cVER/uFUIkpb8+Ynq+zIi6oK
> UV2J95gzJFRmK0weze6fLSAtvjDjP/6XikDora7uT+BGcYoXUkcvzTpjakbJerC4
> Jzb8Ki5MhFTxSK/qBwsseGGgsiTHn8SkW3XL+ImrOPPMhoq8pci4jeMFrxK3Q/v/
> f0GOMRvrJnjzJj6btucDezzdnunaX/iJUTJSwSSFe7DA+hTNcoliySQTZhgwIQes
> XXnKMGxDaneKfQ68lrTZ4RjOAL/G3qfU+LEL6SA91cawBZEZo7FKlDM5btb7vX+f
> HVW08Ol1rnTMD134kBz/hgPmsEmOEm3vfIICEExHDIaQSjutHIhOWBV/5x28y92p
> nA2HZhvU4KwQb9HuWPMAAOEu69jrfy9Pnaxzw0osC1CqRaCFsk4JDtG+tWWDzUa7
> b7imMkyFj0V9uGpVjzYKV9BNneqaN2bYL2NBLJMBqTnr0FupCY1iCYXlRi3oRNvh
> YvUY7wiLe6KEmjtepG+7H35RqueM2syWHn9n7OVHObFWbKmyLhKg+WzDmecsnpg6
> XokKRT2G4EybG6KW9qBSa5TTigL4EJImn6Nd3DAjOWAVki98IcY55BJXJeMBxMiu
> wDC4PurAiZwFIbyuq9H3
> =eXfv
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da5d904.8000...@ime.usp.br
>
>
