On May 24, 2006, at 9:14 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 05:00:15PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 07:09:08PM -0700, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
On Thu, 04 May 2006 23:41:28 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:52:49AM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:12:56PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:41:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 04:38:07PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
Hey, cool. so ARCH=ppc will work both for apus and prep, and
the rest should
go with ARCH=powerpc. This is the case both for 2.6.16 and the
upcoming
2.6.17, right ?
I don't remember when he fixed it precisely but I think 2.6.16
got it
yes.
Do you know if there are SMP PReP machines around ? I think i
will do only a
UP -prep flavour.
There were at least dual 604 PreP boards.
The IBM 7043-240 is a dual-cpu system, I think it's PReP?
Thanks for the info.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
SMP never worked under Linux on those machines because the AIX boot
sequence to enable it was never successfully reverse-engineered.
Ah, ok, then it makes no sense to build a special kernel for those,
until more
information is found about the above.
I have a Motorola MTX PreP system with dual 604e's that I can test this
on.
I was referring to the IBM 7043. No idea how it applies to the MTX.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
