On Apr 12, 2006, at 5:02 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 16:35 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well... MOL does it pretty well :) It's more difficult but
technically
possible
without too much performance loss.
Still, it is currently impossible to run a linux 2.6 kernel on top
of MOL.
Irrelevant. That's a detail of nobody taking the time to fix the bug.
The mecanism used by MOL would work for something like Xen which
was my
point.
Technically, perhaps. But MOL not supporting 2.6 is not irrelevant
from the user's perspective.
If it doesn't work--regardless of where the problem lies; whether
MOL, 2.6, or the underlying hardware--it's still broken. Given the
lack of mention of support for the year-old 10.4(Tiger) and that 2.6
is >2 years old; I wouldn't be surprised to find that MOL is an
inactive project.
But I hold out hope....
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
