On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:06:03PM -0800, Michael M. wrote: > Guido Guenther wrote: > >On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:02:40PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > >>The rivafb kernel support varies somewhat. Depending on the precise model, > >>stuff like backlight control may work, or may break. Guido Guenther used > >>to keep rivafb patches on the net, so you may want to google around. Sleep > >>support with rivafb I doubt somewhat. Suspend to disk might work though. > > > >Rivafb is working quiet on NV17, NV3X although it's been mostly replaced > >by nvidiafb these days. Brightness Control should work with both > >drivers (only used rivafb so far though) and suspend to disks works out > >of the box with recent 2.6. kernels - suspend is a no go, as you said. > >What does lspci tell about the card, I can't seem to find a MX 400 in > >the kernel's current pci_ids. > > lspci - > 0000:00:10:00 vga compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11 > [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] (revb2) > > 00:10:00? I thought it was PCI:00:16:00 when I reconfigured either xorg > or XF86. This is basically the "bus Id", you can get the pci id of the device with "lspci -n". > > Is 2.6.8 a recent enough kernel? The last rivafb fixes went into 2.6.11. Cheers, -- Guido
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
