On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:49 AM, Cedric Pradalier wrote: > I'd like to know if there is still people using this module,
I've used it for a while: http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2005/01/msg00453.html Now i'm living without thermal control. The logic board of my ibook has been substituted two times, but i don't know if this is somehow correlated with the lack of thermal control: my laptop is in the "Repair Extension Program". > if these users would like to see this module included an > official kernel Yes, of course (but, IIRC, BenH didn't like degrees symbol). > if, knowing that lm_sensors should be able to read this > chip, you still need the therm_adm103x module (I think so > since I believe lm_sensor does not provide control over > the chip, or does it?). So you can say that therm_adm103x is definitively better than lm_sensors? > Thanks for you answers. Thank to you for your work. luca -- Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein http://shammash.homelinux.org/ - http://www.artha.org/shammash/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
