On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 09:03:26PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:41:12PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:29:52PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 02:43:02PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > >>> Does this mean that, until the issue is fixed, one can simply "go > > > > >>> into > > > > >>> /usr/share/kernel-package/kernel/arch/ppc.mk or ppc64.mk and edit > > > > >>> it so > > > > > > Sven, I just saw that actually there is no such file here. You > > > meant to write instead about the files in > > > /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/arches/ > > > > > > Correct? > > > > Yeah. Actually, Manoj was searching for testers, or someone with will to > > play > > with it. Basically, what needs done is to patch architecture.mk to check the > > version (either $(version) or $(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL).$(SUBLEVEL), example > > in > > misc/initrd.mk), and then chose the old ppc/ppc64.mk code for older than > > 2.6.15, and use the new powerpc.mk code for 2.6.15 and beyond. > > > > If you (or someone else) would have time to test this > > After Christmas, yes. That is from Dec 28 on .... And please, if
Oh well, i will try to find time before then, maybe. > possible somehow, give me a .deb package to install for testing, not a > tarball I have to compile/install, with the consequence of having to > remove dozens of test files manually after having installed them. I > hate the latter, I admit ... :) Except there are just a few files to > install and test ... Just modify the installed files in /usr/share/kernel-pacakge and provide a diff to them ? > > and implement it, > > If this means writing the patches: No. Simply for a lack of the necessary > skills to do that. Ok. Other's may be interested. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
