On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 17:48 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > > Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 16:54 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > > > >> Well, I think it's clear: We need a binary-only upload of tetex-bin. > >> I've never done that on one of the developer machines; is there any DD > >> on the powerpc list who is willing to save me from learning ;-)? > > > > Yeah, but why did this happen in the first place? Broken buildd? Also, > > what about s390? (And why are they no longer on the CC list?) > > To summarize: Lots of packages depending on libpng12-0 had problems on > powerpc and s390 recently; for some of them (e.g. gimp) they seem to be > solved now (with the NMU'ed version 1.2.8rel-1.0.1), but for some, at > least tetex-bin, problems have actually started with that version. > Recompiling the packages against the new version helps, and I'm looking > for someone to make bin-NMUs of tetex-bin. gs-gpl still seems to be > affected, too > (cf. > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=quagga&ver=0.99.1-6&arch=s390&stamp=1127770198&file=log&as=raw > for s390, on powerpc it seems to be solved with gs-gpl_8.15-4 - compare > the last two builds on > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=powerpc&pkg=quagga).
I don't really like the idea of bin-NMUing all those packages without understanding the cause. If it turns out to be a real bug somewhere that needs fixing, the whole bin-NMU dance will have to be done all over again. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
