On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:18:14AM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:51:18PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > > http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6/ > > > > > > I have done a second build, with the following changes, as > > > 2.6.12-5.99.sarge2 > > > Only the first change is relevant, URL as immediately above :) > > > > > > * Change kernel-source build dependancy to > > > kernel-package (>= 8.135) [!powerpc] | kernel-package (>= > > > 8.135.sarge1) [powerpc] > > > so that this package can be build on an unmodified sarge install > > > on non-powerpc > > > * Add myself and Sven Luther as uploaders > > > > Maybe we should move that stuff to the SVN, under dists/sarge/backports or > > something such ? > > Yes, i think that would be an excellent idea. > perhaps just put it in dists/sarge, or if you want > to make a distinction, dists/sarge-backports
Debian-sarge is fine, what about uploading those to sarge-proposed-updates ? Not sure if that one is auto-built, or even easily accessible from the user stand-point. Maybe this is one of the things we need to discuss in oldenbourg with Joey ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
