On Monday 15 August 2005 21:02, Sven Luther wrote: > As a result, the floppies present in sarge are entirely broken and will > never work. Also the 2.6 floppies, even with miboot present never > worked fiably, annd since we are doing away with the 2.4 kernels for > etch, this means that the miboot floppy target is going away then.
Is the status for the images at http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-powerpc/current/images/powerpc/floppy/ and http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-powerpc/current/images/powerpc/floppy-2.4/ both the same? Are both broken? Should we mention this in the errata on http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/index#errata for the Sarge images? Or should we try to get them removed / add a README in the those directories? Should maybe something be added on the powerpc port pages about this issue? Does this also mean that the line for powerpc - oldworld - floppy-2.4 on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ports-status should also be listed as "broken" and in red? Cheers, FJP
pgpuGrvrxo8tU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
