Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 2.6.12 "final" ?
No kernel stayed at version 2.6.11.
> Hrm... can you try building it without cpufreq support and tell me if it
> makes a difference ?
I disabled the cpufreq stuff, installed the kernel, rebooted and then
put the machine in sleep and then tried to wake it.
Unfortunately if didn't come out of sleep. The console messages before
disabling cpufreq were (typed by hand):
eth1: Airport entering sleep mode
eth0: suspending, WakeOnLan disabled
aty128fb: suspending ...
HID1, before: 10000000
aty128fb: resumed!
HID1, before: 10000000
cpufreq: resume failed to asser curret frequency is what timing core thinks
it is.
eth0: resuming
PHY ID: 4061e4, addr: 0
ath1: Airport waking up
eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full-duplex
eth0: Pause is disabled
After disabling cpufreq, there was no cpufreq message but it was
otherwise pretty similar. I do notice that when it unsuccessfully
comes out of sleep I can connect and disconnect the network cable
and I keep on getting more messages.
This could be a problem with X not being woken up correctly. I
also noticed that after the apt-get upgrade my X cursor had changed.
Did the upgrade possibly install Xorg? How can I tell?
Cheers,
Erik
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"C++ is an atrocity, the bletcherous scab of the computing world,
responsible for more buffer overflows, more security breaches,
more blue screens of death, more mysterious failures than any
other computer language in the history of the planet Earth."
-- Eric Lee Green
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
