On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 09:42:09AM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 09:55:17AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Damnit. But Jens reported it as working on his oldworld box. Could you maybe > > fill a bug report against kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc about this ? > > I suspect that the one that worked was SCSI only. All the first generation > PCI powermacs (7x00,8x00,9x00) had one or two SCSI controllers, but no > onboard IDE. However, most of the G3 models had IDE and SCSI onboard, and > used mostly IDE devices.
Ah, maybe ... > > Ok. We need to know what is your ide controller, and in which udeb it is > > found, and if discover lists it or not. > > If it is the onboard stuff, it can't be built as a separate module from > the way the source looks. It appears that ide/ppc/pmac.c is always > compiled into ide-core if it is enabled. Yes, indeed it is. > > Definitively a bug in discover, could you fill a bug report against > > discover1 > > with your lspci and lspci -n output ? > > You won't get much help out of lspci. These are not PCI devices. The macio > chip shows up as one huge PCI device, and the macio layer knows how to /proc/device-tree/aliases then. And this probably means that there is no chance ever of discover discovering them. Oh well. > read data from OF to find the sub-devices. I don't think either version > of discover has any knowledge of macio, which prevents detection of drivers > like mac53c94, mesh, mace, pmac_zilog, and lots of other older mac stuff. > The pmac IDE support can handle both PCI and macio devices, but I'm pretty > sure that only newworld macs came with onboard IDE that showed up as > separate PCI devices. Probably yes. Friendly, Sven Luther
