On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:21:59AM -0400, Scott Henson wrote: } Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: } } > On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 10:59:07PM +0000, Alexander Solla wrote: } > I wouldn't be quite automatic. Among other things, I would want } > Debian-managed software to be outside the main tree (i.e. in /usr/local } > or, better, in /sw or the like). I also wouldn't want or need much of } > the software that is shipped with MacOS X, so there would have to be } > equivs packages set up for all of that stuff. This includes things like } > the X server, the compiler, etc. It would also be very interesting to } > have two versions of anything Qt-based, since there is a MacOS-native } > version of the Qt library (GPL'd as well as commercial). I don't think } > any of this would require tremendous work, just an unofficial repository } > to supply the modified and extra packages. } > } } I don't know about this. That sounds a lot like what fink is doing. [...]
See my previous post on why Fink isn't good enough. Anyhow, I'm in favor of a full Debian Darwin distribution. My intentions, however, are to use it to make well-packaged software available on MacOS X. } Scott Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --Greg
