Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Em Thursday 29 July 2004 20:39, you wrote:
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
Thanks. Are the extra patches inside your attached patch good
enough to contribute back to gcc mainline?
e.g. would it be sensible to do
mv debian/patches/glibc-2.3.2-csu-make.patch
patches/glibc-2.3.2/glibc-2.3.2-csu-make.patch ?
Yes. In fact I have already emailed it:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/2004-07/msg00035.html
I guess I'll test with dash, then. Is this the right URL?
http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/dash/
Also, have you verified that patch works with other shells?
All the others are already in crosstool:
glibc-2.3.2-allow-gcc-3.4-inline.patch
glibc-2.3.2-without-fp.patch
glibc-2.3.2-powerpc-procfs.patch
sscanf.patch
Why the duplication? Oh, your procedure doesn't use *any* of the
patches in the crosstool patch repository, so you had to
copy the ones you felt you needed, I guess.
- Dan
--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime
change
