On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 03:57:22PM +0100, Jens Schmalzing wrote: > Dear Sven, > > > I will probably use the -benh tree for future official debian kernels > > Please keep in mind that kernel-patch-benh exists already. You should
Well, my plan was to let 2.4.22 stay at the linuxppc tree, jump over 2.4.23, and have 2.4.24 and beyond based on the -benh tree. But has been stopped of doing this by the inability of extracting a clean 2.4.24 version of the -benh (or linuxppc for that matter) bitkeeper tree, since nobody actually tagged it properly in the mess that followed the hasty 2.4.24 release. If you like, i would not be adverse to you becoming co-maintainer of the kernel-patch package or something. The main thing is to have the newer apple hardware be supported out of the box by the official kernel, which would mean official debian-installer support also. > at least let it die gracefully if you make it obsolete. Then again, > I'm beginning to catch up on my work in general and my Debian stuff in > particular (btw, how are the new mol packages doing on pegasos?), so I Yeah, they work fine one the pegasos 2. I don't think we should care about pegasos 1 anymore, since no new versions will be built, and the 0.9.68 mol i provide to pegasos 1 users works just fine. > wouldn't say no if you suggested co-maintainership. Let's do it then, I seriously need help in investigating all those pmac specific bug reports, and also for setting up the officially build modules for official kernel stuff. Friendly, Sven Luther
