Le mer 21/01/2004 à 11:37, Benjamin Herrenschmidt a écrit : > On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 04:22, mammique wrote: > > Hi, > > > > i try to use an usb digital camera on an AlBook under debian unstable > > with kernel 2.6.1-ben1. Gphoto2 works well as root but not as normal > > user, usbfs seems to be mounted correctly with devmode=0666 wich should > > provide access to usb device r/w for normal user : > > I've had this problem before, though I didn't quite figure out what > was going on (I admit I didn't spend a lot of time investigating > neither). > > Could you fwd to the usb-devel list ? >
Done, i attached the reply :-) > If you don't get an answer there, I'll try to find some time to > investigate myself again. I'm quite busy lately though... > > Ben. -- mammique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Begin Message ---Content-Description: Message transféré - usbfs devmode problem on 2.6.1-ben1 > Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:22:22 +0100 > From: mammique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org > Subject: usbfs devmode problem on 2.6.1-ben1 > > Hi, > > i try to use an usb digital camera on an AlBook under debian unstable > with kernel 2.6.1-ben1. Gphoto2 works well as root but not as normal > user, usbfs seems to be mounted correctly with devmode=0666 wich should > provide access to usb device r/w for normal user : > > # mount > /dev/hda4 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro) > proc on /proc type proc (rw) > devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) > /dev/hda6 on /home type ext3 (rw) > sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) > usbfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw,devmode=0666) > > OK, but if i look at real perms on filesystem : > > $ ls -la /proc/bus/usb/001/ > total 0 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jan 20 15:37 . > drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 0 Jan 20 15:37 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 43 Jan 20 15:37 001 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 211 Jan 20 15:37 002 > > it seems the devmode=0666 perms were not applied. Does somebody knows > why ? Is it a bug ? It is a bug. Look at http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1418 for more information. Sorry, greg k-h
--- End Message ---