On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 15:03, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:43:45PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > # Invoke APM scripts
> > if [ -d /etc/apm/event.d ]; then
> > run-parts --arg="suspend" --arg="resume"
> > /etc/apm/event.d
> > fi
> > if [ -d /etc/apm/suspend.d ]; then
> > run-parts --arg="suspend" --arg="resume"
> > /etc/apm/suspend.d
> > fi
>
> It seems to me that is possible for some scripts to be linked from
> suspend.d to event.d. Don't you risk to execute some script twice in the
> above way?
Then so would /etc/apm/apmd_proxy; in fact, I wonder why I'm not using
that, instead of duplicating it badly... I seem to remember there used
to be a reason I couldn't use it, but I forget what it was. Of course,
it's a bit inconvenient because you can't have apmd and pmud installed
at the same time, but here's my current version:
function pwrctl_Core99()
{
case "$1" in
[...]
sleep)
[...]
# Invoke APM scripts
[ -x /etc/apm/apmd_proxy ] && /etc/apm/apmd_proxy suspend user
[...]
;;
wakeup)
[...]
# Invoke APM scripts
[ -x /etc/apm/apmd_proxy ] && /etc/apm/apmd_proxy resume suspend
;;
[...]
esac
case "$2" in
ac)
[...]
# Invoke APM scripts
[ -x /etc/apm/apmd_proxy ] && /etc/apm/apmd_proxy change power
;;
*)
[...] # Invoke APM scripts
[ -x /etc/apm/apmd_proxy ] && /etc/apm/apmd_proxy change power
;;
esac
}
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
