On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 13:49, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Saturday 23 August 2003 1:34, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 09:55, Frank Murphy wrote: > > > [...] the attached patch. Tell me what you think about it, it works with > > I haven't tried it yet, but just looking at it, I have a couple of comments. > First, I really like the idea of moving the macos_alt to the altwin map: > much better place.
Glad you like it. > However, I don't want to move the 'extended' or 'laptop' into a > specific macintosh keymap, like you've done here in us. Why, what's the problem with that? macintosh/us is the basis for all macintosh layouts. > Long-term, I'd actually like to increase the similarities between PC > and Apple keyboards, macintosh/us could be changed to include and modify pc symbols? > so get rid of the macintosh directory and be able to use > pc/us(105)+apple or pc/de+apple to specifiy an Apple keyboard (of > course, using the rules so that configuration is similar to what you > have here). Don't (some) international Mac keyboards have specific modifications vs. their PC counterparts though? > > BTW, where do you get the Multi_key definition from? Can't seem to find > > it here. > > What do you mean? Where do I define it (in the apple file)? No, you don't. Maybe you get it from a pc symbols file? > > Speaking of bugs, fn+command generates the same keycode as the eject key > > in X here, but not in console (showkey shows several keycodes for the > > eject key) - maybe related to the keypad equal bug you fixed recently? > > I don't have an eject key here, Your F12 key doesn't work as eject? > but I imagine it's related to X's KP_Equal bug. So was the fix specific to KP_Equal, or could it fix all such keys? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
